Understanding the DLS Method in Cricket
The DLS in cricket, which stands for Duckworth-Lewis-Stern, is a mathematical approach used to adjust target scores when rain interrupts a match. This method is effective for revising targets for the team batting second in these situations.
Background of the DLS in Cricket
In the past, cricket often included a reserve day for rain delays, but as the number of matches increased, this practice became impractical due to logistical and financial reasons. This led to the development of mathematical solutions, like the DLS in cricket, that could provide fair and quick conclusions to games, even though the process was lengthy and had its controversies.
ALSO READ: Who Won the 1992 Cricket World Cup?
History of the D/L Method in Cricket
Originally called the D/L method, this technique was created by statisticians Tony Lewis and Frank Duckworth. They aimed to find the fairest way to end rain-affected matches in cricket. Duckworth is the editor of the Royal Statistical Society’s magazine, while Lewis serves as the chair of the Operational Research Society’s Western Branch and teaches mathematics at the University of the West of England.
The first successful application of the D/L method occurred on January 1, 1997, during an ODI match between Zimbabwe and England. Zimbabwe won the game by seven runs after using the DLS in cricket calculation. The England Cricket Board and Zimbabwe Cricket Union quickly adopted this method, and in 1999, the International Cricket Council began using it for all international matches.
In November 2014, after the retirement of Duckworth and Lewis, the method was renamed DLS, with Professor Steven Stern taking over its maintenance and updates. Stern, an Australian academic from Bond University, modified the D/L formula for the 2015 World Cup, thereby associating his name with the DLS in cricket method.
Previous Calculation Methods in Cricket
Before the DLS in cricket method, the sport relied on different calculations, including the Average Run Rate (ARR) and the Most Productive Overs (MPO) methods, both of which had significant flaws.
Average Run Rate Method in Cricket
The ARR method was utilized by the ICC from the early 1950s until 1991, but it was scrapped due to several inaccurate decisions. A notable instance occurred during the 1988-89 World Series Cup, where Australia set a target of 227 runs against West Indies. After rain interrupted the match, West Indies had a revised target based on the ARR, which unfairly favored them. This led to criticism from Australian fans, media, and players, resulting in the introduction of the Most Productive Overs method in cricket.
Most Productive Overs Method in Cricket
The MPO method was introduced to address fairness issues but only lasted six years. It calculated the new target based on the highest runs scored by the first team in a specific number of overs. This method favored the batting first team and led to absurd situations, such as during the 1992 World Cup semi-final where South Africa was given an impossible target after rain interrupted their innings. This highlighted the need for a more equitable solution, ultimately leading to the DLS in cricket.
How the DLS Method Works in Cricket
Unlike its predecessors, the DLS in cricket method considers both the number of wickets remaining and the overs left in the game. It adjusts the target score by analyzing available resources, which include the number of wickets and overs.
Formula of DLS in Cricket
The DLS formula calculates the target score based on the runs a team needs to score, assuming both teams have equal resources at that point in the match. The formula is:
Team 2’s par score = Team 1’s score × (Team 2’s resources / Team 1’s resources)
At the start of the match, both teams have full resources—50 overs and 10 wickets. As the match progresses, the remaining balls and wickets are represented as percentages. These percentages are calculated using historical scoring data from international matches over the past four years. Each year, new data is added, making the DLS method adaptive and continuously evolving.
READ MORE:
